Empowering the Next Generation to End Stigma by Starting the Conversation: Bring Change to Mind and the College Toolbox Project

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes in a 4-year college pilot program built on stigma change research. U Bring Change to Mind (UBC2M) was developed and launched at Indiana University (IU) in 2014 as an institutionally supported, student-led organization to make campuses "safe and stigma-free zones." The accompanying College Toolbox Project (CTP) assessed change in student prejudice and discriminatory predispositions as well as perceptions and behaviors at follow-up. METHOD: All entering Class of 2019 students were invited to complete a Web-based survey (N = 3,287; response rate = 44.6%). In their third year, students were sent a follow-up survey. Stigma indicators for 1,132 students completing both waves were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate regressions. Models controlled for social desirability, prior contact, socio-demographics, and self-reported mental illness. Participation was examined for potential biases. RESULTS: Statistically significant positive changes in attitudes and behavioral predispositions emerged. Although fewer students with prior contact endorsed stigma items initially, they reported significant reduction at follow-up. UBC2M active engagement was associated with lowering prejudice. Both passive and active engagement predicted change in discriminatory predispositions as well as current inclusive behaviors and positive perceptions of campus mental health culture. CONCLUSION: A long-term, community-based, student empowerment approach with institutional supports is a promising avenue to reduce stigma on college campuses, to develop the next generation of mental health leaders, and to potentially reduce societal levels of stigma in the long run. CTP provides evidence that both contact and contextual visibility matter, and that UBC2M offers a nationally networked organizational strategy to reduce stigma.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 64 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.