SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Global Distribution of Google Scholar Citations: A Size-independent Institution-based Analysis
11 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Global Distribution of Google Scholar Citations: A Size-independent Institution-based Analysis (2019)Global Distribution of Google Scholar Cit…Scientific wealth and inequality within nations (2017)Scientific wealth and inequal…Google Scholar Citations (2014)Google Scholar CitationsA longitudinal study of Google Scholar coverage between 2012 and 2013 (2013)A longitudinal study of Googl…A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners (2012)A preliminary test of Google …Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis (2011)Is Google Scholar useful for …Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management (2010)Counting the citations: a com…Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2007)Google Scholar as a new sourc…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2006)A New Era in Citation and Bib…Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes (2005)Google Scholar: The New Gener…Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI’s Citation Index and Google’s Scholar service (2005)Equivalence of results from t…The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? (2017)An introduction to informetrics (1992)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Customer journeys: a systematic literature review (2018)Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Cultural diversity in organizations (1993)Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements (1995)Design-Based Research (2012)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings (2009)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The Impact Factor Game (2006)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals (2009)Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (2017)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns (2015)Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)The Scientific Wealth of Nations (1997)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? (2005)INDICATORS OF THE SCIENTIFIC IMPACT OF NATIONS REVISITED; pp. 231–250 (2020)Research on Innovation in Business and Management about China and Latin America: Bibliometric Insights Using Google Scholar, Dimensions and Microsoft Academic (2021)The interplay of the size of the research system, ways of collaboration, level, and method of funding in determining bibliometric outputs (2022)The politics of publication (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,591 cited
  • 2007Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis705 cited
  • 2011Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis334 cited
  • 2005Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes297 cited
  • 2012A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners225 cited
  • 2010Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management198 cited
  • 2006A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar143 cited
  • 2013A longitudinal study of Google Scholar coverage between 2012 and 2013139 cited
  • 2005Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI’s Citation Index and Google’s Scholar service115 cited
  • 2017Scientific wealth and inequality within nations14 cited
  • 2014Google Scholar Citations10 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work