Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Petitions in scientific argumentation: Dissecting the request to retire statistical significance

13 references·1 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
1974The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations4,004 cited
2019Scientists rise up against statistical significance2,997 cited
2002Democratic Phoenix1,576 cited
2017World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice1,345 cited
2012Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science1,321 cited
1995Epidemiology Faces Its Limits841 cited
2019Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication427 cited
2019A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field356 cited
2017The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research309 cited
1999Rise and fall of modern medicine296 cited
2016Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines156 cited
2019Retiring statistical significance would give bias a free pass46 cited

Cited by

2020Scientific petitions and open letters in the era of covid-197 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work