SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Study characteristics impacted the pragmatism of randomized controlled trial published in nursing: a meta-epidemiological study
4 references·1 citing·23 second hop
Study characteristics impacted the pragmatism of randomized controlled trial published in nursing: a meta-epidemiological study (2019)Study characteristics impacted the pragma…The PRECIS-2 tool has good interrater reliability and modest discriminant validity (2017)The PRECIS-2 tool has good in…Pragmatic vs. explanatory: An adaptation of the PRECIS tool helps to judge the applicability of systematic reviews for daily practice (2011)Pragmatic vs. explanatory: An…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies (2006)A simple and valid tool disti…Comments, suggestions, and criticisms of the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 design tool: a citation analysis (2024)Comments, suggestions, and cr…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Exploring the pragmatic and explanatory study design on outcomes of systematic reviews of public health interventions: a case study on obesity prevention trials (2014)Understanding the applicability of results from primary care trials: lessons learned from applying PRECIS-2 (2017)A review of pragmatic trials found a high degree of diversity in design and scope, deficiencies in reporting and trial registry data, and poor indexing (2021)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life (2003)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications (2009)A meta-analysis of nonrandomized effectiveness studies on outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders (2013)Do Evidence-Based Interventions Work When Tested in the “Real World?” A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Parent Management Training for the Treatment of Child Disruptive Behavior (2013)Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement (2008)SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols (2013)The role of pragmatism in explaining heterogeneity in meta-analyses of randomised trials: a protocol for a cross-sectional methodological review (2017)Articles provided insufficient information to conduct an appropriate retrospective assessment of the pragmatic/explanatory features of medicine trials with the PRECIS-2 tool (2020)Unveiling the Crucial Factors of Women Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century (2021)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews (2016)Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. (2017)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2006A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies207 cited
  • 2017The PRECIS-2 tool has good interrater reliability and modest discriminant validity67 cited
  • 2011Pragmatic vs. explanatory: An adaptation of the PRECIS tool helps to judge the applicability of systematic reviews for daily practice56 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Comments, suggestions, and criticisms of the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 design tool: a citation analysis10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work