SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting and guidelines for mendelian randomization analysis: A systematic review of oncological studies
10 references·1 citing·40 second hop
Reporting and guidelines for mendelian randomization analysis: A systematic review of oncological studies (2019)Reporting and guidelines for mendelian ra…The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005 (2018)The Proposal to Lower P Value…Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research (2018)Reporting guidelines for onco…Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions (2015)Using data sources beyond Pub…Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement (2009)Strengthening the reporting o…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment (2002)Sensitivity Analysis for Impo…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Reporting and methodological quality of studies that use Mendelian randomisation in UK Biobank: a meta-epidemiological study (2022)Reporting and methodological …Statistics for Experimenters (1979)Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences (1994)A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output (1999)A new uncertainty importance measure (2006)“Opening Up” and “Closing Down” (2007)Why so many published sensitivity analyses are false: A systematic review of sensitivity analysis practices (2019)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)Mortality Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in the Veterans Health Administration: An Evidence Review and Map (2018)Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review (2019)The Impact of COVID-19 School Closure on Child and Adolescent Health: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)How to write and publish an original research article (2009)Publication guidelines need widespread adoption (2011)Setting the RECORD straight: developing a guideline for the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected Data (2013)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Biospecimen Data Reporting in the Research Literature (2019)Reporting guidelines enhance the quality and impact of research in Dental Traumatology (2023)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Redefine statistical significance (2017)Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017 (2018)Psychology's Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological Science (2019)On climate anxiety and the threat it may pose to daily life functioning and adaptation: a study among European and African French-speaking participants (2022)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
  • 2002Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment1,303 cited
  • 2018The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005654 cited
  • 2009Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement183 cited
  • 2015Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions166 cited
  • 2018Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research29 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Reporting and methodological quality of studies that use Mendelian randomisation in UK Biobank: a meta-epidemiological study19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work