A bibliometric analysis of the 103 top-cited articles in endodontics

Bülent Yılmaz · Muzaffer Emir Dinçol · Turgut Yağmur Yalçın

51 citations0/0 files storedActa Odontologica Scandinavica

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify the 100 top-cited articles in endodontics and analyse their bibliometric characteristics.Material and methods: The Web of Science database was reviewed to identify the relevant articles.Results: One hundred and three articles were included because the last four articles had the same number of citations. The top-cited article received 2115 citations. The articles were published in 28 different journals, with the most popular publication being the Journal of Endodontics (n = 36). The most prolific country was the United States (n = 41), followed by Sweden (n = 17) and Switzerland (n = 8). The most prolific author and institution were M. Torabinejad (n = 12) and Umeå University (n = 9), respectively. The majority of articles were of a basic science nature (n = 55), while endodontic microbiology (n = 24) was the most frequent subspecialty. The most common study design used in clinical articles was non-randomized experimental study (n = 5). Half of the clinical articles (n = 11) had a level III evidence score.Conclusions: The present citation analysis provides insights into the historical progress and current trends in endodontics.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 51 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation 2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals 1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review 2006Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science 2007Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis 1969Bradford's Law and the Bibliography of Science 1987100 Citation Classics From The Journal of the American Medical Association

Cited by

2023PROBE 2023 guidelines for reporting observational studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration 2021A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most‐cited case reports and case series in Endodontic journals 2022Bibliometric analysis of top-cited articles in Journal of Dental Sciences 2021The Top 100 Most Cited Articles Published in Dentistry: 2020 Update 2020The 100 most-cited papers in oral medicine and pathology

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.