SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Beijing direct investment to its neighbors: A pollution haven or pollution halo effect?
16 references·1 citing·43 second hop
Beijing direct investment to its neighbors: A pollution haven or pollution halo effect? (2019)Beijing direct investment to its neighbor…Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China's cities? A spatial econometric perspective (2017)Does foreign direct investmen…A new look at the FDI–income–energy–environment nexus: Dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN (2016)A new look at the FDI–income–…Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? (2015)Does foreign direct investmen…Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China (2012)Industrial structural transfo…Foreign Direct Investment, Human Capital and Environmental Pollution in China (2011)Foreign Direct Investment, Hu…GROWTH, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, AND THE ENVIRONMENT: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE CITIES (2010)GROWTH, FOREIGN DIRECT INVEST…Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China (2008)Are foreign investors attract…Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces (2006)Pollution haven hypothesis an…Trade, Growth, and the Environment (2004)Trade, Growth, and the Enviro…Trade, Growth, and the Environment (2004)Trade, Growth, and the Enviro…Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment? (2002)Do Lax Environmental Regulati…Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries (2001)Technological regimes, catchi…Havens, Halos and Spaghetti: Untangling the Evidence about Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment (1999)Havens, Halos and Spaghetti: …Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? (1998)Is Free Trade Good for the En…Economic Growth and the Environment (1994)Economic Growth and the Envir…Leapfrogging in international competition: A theory of cycles in national technological leadership (1993)Leapfrogging in international…Policy dividend or “policy trap”? Environmental welfare of establishing free trade zone in China (2020)Policy dividend or “policy tr…A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth (1956)Measuring the efficiency of decision making units (1978)Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models (1998)International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: A case study of Chinas industrial sectors (2014)The role of renewable energy technological innovation on climate change: Empirical evidence from China (2019)How does industrial structure adjustment reduce CO2 emissions? Spatial and mediation effects analysis for China (2021)International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle (1966)Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments (1986)The Competitive Advantage of Nations (1991)Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership:Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems (2016)From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy (2016)Complex Economic Activities Concentrate in Large Cities (2018)Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement (1991)Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? (1994)North-South Trade and the Environment (1994)CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France (2007)How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? (2017)Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship (1995)How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency: Evidence from China (2020)How does green finance affect green total factor productivity? Evidence from China (2022)The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988 (1991)Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? (1995)FDI and the Capital Intensity of “Dirty” Sectors: A Missing Piece of the Pollution Haven Puzzle (2005)An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy (2009)Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: Causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa (2014)Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations (1991)Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2001)Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: An empirical investigation (2017)Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: Some empirical evidence (2019)How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data (2020)Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods (1969)Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth (1986)On the mechanics of economic development (1988)Modelling for insight: Does financial development improve environmental quality? (2019)Effects of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: New evidence from China (2022)Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries (2010)CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia (2014)The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness (2017)STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts (2003)Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey (2004)The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (2004)Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States (2006)Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Economic Growth and the Environment9,835 cited
  • 1998Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?3,020 cited
  • 2004Trade, Growth, and the Environment1,863 cited
  • 2004Trade, Growth, and the Environment1,361 cited
  • 2001Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries1,143 cited
  • 2006Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces705 cited
  • 2008Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China650 cited
  • 2015Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries?634 cited
  • 2002Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment?598 cited
  • 2012Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China512 cited
  • 1993Leapfrogging in international competition: A theory of cycles in national technological leadership428 cited
  • 2011Foreign Direct Investment, Human Capital and Environmental Pollution in China383 cited
  • 2016A new look at the FDI–income–energy–environment nexus: Dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN353 cited
  • 1999Havens, Halos and Spaghetti: Untangling the Evidence about Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

322 cited
  • 2010GROWTH, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, AND THE ENVIRONMENT: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE CITIES315 cited
  • 2017Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China's cities? A spatial econometric perspective292 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Policy dividend or “policy trap”? Environmental welfare of establishing free trade zone in China66 cited