SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A priori power considerations in orthodontic research: a 3 year meta-epidemiologic study
16 references·1 citing·37 second hop
A priori power considerations in orthodontic research: a 3 year meta-epidemiologic study (2019)A priori power considerations in orthodon…Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)Misrepresentation and distort…Statistical testing against baseline was common in dental research (2015)Statistical testing against b…Risk of bias and magnitude of effect in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological review (2015)Risk of bias and magnitude of…Are Sample Sizes Clear and Justified in RCTs Published in Dental Journals? (2014)Are Sample Sizes Clear and Ju…Sample size in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: are numbers justified? (2013)Sample size in orthodontic ra…Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 2011 (2012)Reporting quality of abstract…Are clustering effects accounted for in statistical analysis in leading dental specialty journals? (2012)Are clustering effects accoun…Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance (2011)Erroneous analyses of interac…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published? (2009)Are studies reporting signifi…What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)What is missing from descript…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The reporting adherence of observational studies published in orthodontic journals in relation to STROBE guidelines: a meta-epidemiological assessment (2022)The reporting adherence of ob…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: The CALO-RE taxonomy (2011)Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data) (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Application within and adaptations for orthodontic trials (2015)Dental Research Waste in Design, Analysis, and Reporting: A Scoping Review (2020)CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomized trials (2023)Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study (2008)Computation of measures of effect size for neuroscience data sets (2011)Sleep deprivation and stressors: Evidence for elevated negative affect in response to mild stressors when sleep deprived. (2012)Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking (2016)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? (2018)The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses (2019)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Explanation and Elaboration Statement (2016)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria (2015)Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,871 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,019 cited
  • 2011Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance868 cited
  • 2008What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?613 cited
  • 2018Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature273 cited
  • 2012Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 201171 cited
  • 2009Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?67 cited
  • 2012Are clustering effects accounted for in statistical analysis in leading dental specialty journals?65 cited
  • 2014Are Sample Sizes Clear and Justified in RCTs Published in Dental Journals?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

53 cited
  • 2015Risk of bias and magnitude of effect in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological review35 cited
  • 2013Sample size in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: are numbers justified?31 cited
  • 2015Statistical testing against baseline was common in dental research15 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022The reporting adherence of observational studies published in orthodontic journals in relation to STROBE guidelines: a meta-epidemiological assessment7 cited