SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparison of information sources used in Cochrane and non‐Cochrane systematic reviews: A case study in the field of anesthesiology and pain
16 references·1 citing·49 second hop
Comparison of information sources used in Cochrane and non‐Cochrane systematic reviews: A case study in the field of anesthesiology and pain (2019)Comparison of information sources used in…Revisiting the need for a literature search narrative: A brief methodological note (2018)Revisiting the need for a lit…Challenges of identifying unpublished data from clinical trials: Getting the best out of clinical trials registers and other novel sources (2018)Challenges of identifying unp…Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses (2017)Impact of searching clinical …Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews (2017)Grey literature in systematic…Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis (2014)Clinical trials registries ar…Publication Bias in the Anesthesiology Literature (2012)Publication Bias in the Anest…Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews (2011)Checking reference lists to f…Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy (2009)Cochrane reviews used more ri…Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews (2009)Checking reference lists to f…Negative pressure wound therapy: Potential publication bias caused by lack of access to unpublished study results data (2008)Negative pressure wound thera…Handsearching still a valuable element of the systematic review (2008)Handsearching still a valuabl…Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials (2007)Handsearching versus electron…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…BEYOND MEDLINE (2003)BEYOND MEDLINEDoes the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Does the inclusion of grey li…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Existence of Publication …Performance of conceptual framework elements for the retrieval of qualitative health literature: a case study (2021)Performance of conceptual fra…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2017)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)Intersectionality in quantitative health disparities research: A systematic review of challenges and limitations in empirical studies (2021)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF): properties and frontier of current knowledge (2010)A systematic review of help-seeking interventions for depression, anxiety and general psychological distress (2012)Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review (2014)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Publication Bias, Retrospective Bias, and Reproducibility of Significant Results in Observational Studies (2012)Poor agreement in significant findings between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized trials in perioperative medicine (2016)The relationship between study findings and publication outcome in anesthesia research: a retrospective observational study examining publication bias (2016)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects (2011)What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary (2016)The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy (2017)Comparison of aggregate and individual participant data approaches to meta-analysis of randomised trials: An observational study (2020)Searching clinical trials registers: guide for systematic reviewers (2022)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering in adults: Two decades of deception detection (2019)Risk and protective factors for mental health in elite athletes: a scoping review (2019)Restricting evidence syntheses of interventions to English-language publications is a viable methodological shortcut for most medical topics: a systematic review (2021)Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2008)Semi‐automating the manual literature search for systematic reviews increases efficiency (2009)Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: A scoping review (2023)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2000Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?811 cited
  • 2011Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews445 cited
  • 2017Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews325 cited
  • 2007Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials247 cited
  • 2009Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy201 cited
  • 2017Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses107 cited
  • 2003BEYOND MEDLINE105 cited
  • 2012Publication Bias in the Anesthesiology Literature72 cited
  • 2008Handsearching still a valuable element of the systematic review68 cited
  • 2018Revisiting the need for a literature search narrative: A brief methodological note66 cited
  • 2014Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis61 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2008Negative pressure wound therapy: Potential publication bias caused by lack of access to unpublished study results data54 cited
  • 2009Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews46 cited
  • 2018Challenges of identifying unpublished data from clinical trials: Getting the best out of clinical trials registers and other novel sources38 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Performance of conceptual framework elements for the retrieval of qualitative health literature: a case study7 cited