SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Measuring sustainable development in the education area using multi-criteria methods: a case study
16 references·1 citing·29 second hop
Measuring sustainable development in the education area using multi-criteria methods: a case study (2019)Measuring sustainable development in the …The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications (2018)The analytic hierarchy proces…Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review (2016)Measuring systems sustainabil…The future we want (2015)The future we wantAnalysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment (2014)Analysis of the potentials of…Rank Ordering Criteria Weighting Methods – a Comparative Overview (2013)Rank Ordering Criteria Weight…Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends (2011)Multi-criteria decision analy…Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process (2008)Decision making with the anal…An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making (2006)An extension of TOPSIS for gr…Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (2005)Multiple Criteria Decision An…Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models (2004)Comparison of weights in TOPS…Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. (1994)Decisions with Multiple Objec…The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods (1991)The outranking approach and t…Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications (1981)Multiple Attribute Decision M…Multiple Attribute Decision Making (1981)Multiple Attribute Decision M…Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1977)Decisions with Multiple Objec…An Approximate Measure of Value (1954)An Approximate Measure of Val…Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS as a Method for Assessing Socioeconomic Phenomena on the Basis of Survey Data (2021)Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS a…An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities (1951)The Principles of Morals and Legislation (1988)PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications (2009)A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications (2012)The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1985)Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication (2015)Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection (2018)Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods (2020)STATE OF ART SURVEYS OF OVERVIEWS ON MCDM/MADM METHODS (2014)ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications (2015)Theory of games and economic behavior (2019)Optimization by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (1979)Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method (1998)MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING (MCDM) METHODS IN ECONOMICS: AN OVERVIEW / DAUGIATIKSLIAI SPRENDIMŲ PRIĖMIMO METODAI EKONOMIKOJE: APŽVALGA (2011)Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment (2000)A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach (2012)Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain (2013)Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014 (2015)Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS (2003)Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators (2007)Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook (1978)Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem (1997)Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method (2014)An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods (2013)Criteria in AHP: A Systematic Review of Literature (2015)An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains (2016)Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data (1983)Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal (1986)GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process10,295 cited
  • 1981Multiple Attribute Decision Making8,633 cited
  • 1994Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.8,369 cited
  • 1981Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications8,206 cited
  • 2005Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys4,500 cited
  • 1991The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods1,900 cited
  • 1977Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs1,743 cited
  • 2006An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making1,451 cited
  • 2011Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends1,287 cited
  • 2014Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment873 cited
  • 2004Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models775 cited
  • 2015The future we want669 cited
  • 1954An Approximate Measure of Value464 cited
  • 2018The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications430 cited
  • 2013Rank Ordering Criteria Weighting Methods – a Comparative Overview

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

361 cited
  • 2016Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review328 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS as a Method for Assessing Socioeconomic Phenomena on the Basis of Survey Data46 cited