SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Teaching graduate students how to review research articles and respond to reviewer comments
16 references·0 citing·45 second hop
Teaching graduate students how to review research articles and respond to reviewer comments (2019)Teaching graduate students how to review …Ten simple rules for writing a response to reviewers (2017)Ten simple rules for writing …Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases (2017)Semantics derived automatical…Handbook of Big Data (2016)Handbook of Big DataDoes it take too long to publish research? (2016)Does it take too long to publ…Writing science: how to write papers that get cited and proposals that get funded (2013)Writing science: how to write…The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)The publishing delay in schol…Big Data Management, Technologies, and Applications (2013)Big Data Management, Technolo…A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis (2013)A multidisciplinary survey on…Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)Open access versus subscripti…Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded (2011)Writing Science: How to Write…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice (2008)Peer Review and Manuscript Ma…Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice (2008)Peer Review and Manuscript Ma…A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript (2005)A Systematic Guide to Reviewi…How to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication (2004)How to reply to referees' com…The Technique of Clear Writing. (1968)The Technique of Clear Writin…Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts (2001)HOW TO REVIEW A PAPER (2003)Reasons for Rejection of Manuscripts Submitted to AJR by International Authors (2007)Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases (2010)Peer review and the publication process (2016)The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)Prominent but Less Productive (2016)CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences (2014)How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing (2020)Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)The American Psychological Association (1919)Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets (1973)Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. (1995)Measuring discrimination in algorithmic decision making (2017)The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologies (2020)A survey on datasets for fairness‐aware machine learning (2022)Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. (1998)Fairness through awareness (2012)Big Data's Disparate Impact (2014)Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations (2019)A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning (2021)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Technical assessment and evaluation of environmental models and software: Letter to the Editor (2010)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study (2014)The Effects of Reporting Complexity on Small and Large Investor Trading (2010)Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures (2014)The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation (2017)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints (2019)Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process (2021)The New ABCs of Research (2016)Ten simple rules for structuring papers (2017)Making Science Meaningful for Broad Audiences through Stories (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases2,845 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 1968The Technique of Clear Writing.1,641 cited
  • 2012Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact479 cited
  • 2013The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals432 cited
  • 2013A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis288 cited
  • 2016Does it take too long to publish research?267 cited
  • 2005A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript128 cited
  • 2008Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice119 cited
  • 2011Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded90 cited
  • 2013Writing science: how to write papers that get cited and proposals that get funded70 cited
  • 2004How to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication65 cited
  • 2008Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice57 cited
  • 2016Handbook of Big Data47 cited
  • 2017Ten simple rules for writing a response to reviewers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

40 cited
  • 2013Big Data Management, Technologies, and Applications40 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.