SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Being a CMI editor
4 references·0 citing·10 second hop
Being a CMI editor (2019)Being a CMI editorWhat are our aims at CMI? (2018)What are our aims at CMI?Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in CMI (2018)Systematic reviews of diagnos…What can we learn from our peer reviewers (2017)What can we learn from our pe…The CMI welcomes systematic reviews (2016)The CMI welcomes systematic r…Considering resistance in systematic reviews of antibiotic treatment (2003)Systematic review or meta-analysis? Their place in the evidence hierarchy (2013)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy (2013)Immediate rejection of manuscripts without peer review at the CMI (2017)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)Living systematic reviews: aims and standards (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018What are our aims at CMI?18 cited
  • 2018Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in CMI17 cited
  • 2016The CMI welcomes systematic reviews7 cited
  • 2017What can we learn from our peer reviewers7 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work