References

• 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
• 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
• 2014Who publishes in “predatory” journals?360 cited
• 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
• 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?300 cited
• 2008Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.299 cited
• 2000Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial261 cited
• 2003The growth and number of journals180 cited
• 2015Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers163 cited
• 2017The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School105 cited
• 2007Scholarly publishing in sub-Saharan Africa in the twenty-first century: Challenges and opportunities87 cited
• 2010Lancet retracts Wakefield's MMR paper86 cited
• 2014Penetration of Nigerian predatory biomedical open access journals 2007–2012: a bibliometric study70 cited
• 2018Format Aside: Applying Beall's Criteria to Assess the Predatory Nature of both OA and Non-OA Library and Information Science Journals65 cited
• 2012Pay Big to Publish Fast: Academic Journal Rackets.