Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Availability of study protocols for randomized trials published in high-impact medical journals: A cross-sectional analysis

12 references·13 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
2004Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research442 cited
2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
2017Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established240 cited
2015Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review237 cited
2019COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time232 cited
2018How to avoid common problems when using ClinicalTrials.gov in research: 10 issues to consider189 cited
2014Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials187 cited
2008Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet120 cited
2018Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations83 cited
2017Association of Trial Registration With Reporting of Primary Outcomes in Protocols and Publications77 cited
2014Discrepancies between registration and publication of randomised controlled trials: an observational study45 cited

Cited by

2021Cluster randomized trials of individual-level interventions were at high risk of bias

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

34 cited

2024Publication of Results of Registered Trials With Published Study Protocols, 2011-202222 cited

2020Evidence of unexplained discrepancies between planned and conducted statistical analyses: a review of randomised trials19 cited

2022A meta-research study of randomized controlled trials found infrequent and delayed availability of protocols17 cited

2020Articles provided insufficient information to conduct an appropriate retrospective assessment of the pragmatic/explanatory features of medicine trials with the PRECIS-2 tool17 cited

2024Waste not, want not: call to action for spinal manipulative therapy researchers16 cited

2022Access to unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans of randomised trials13 cited

2020Public availability and adherence to prespecified statistical analysis approaches was low in published randomized trials13 cited

2025How can we make sound replication decisions?11 cited

2021Public access to protocols of contemporary cancer randomized clinical trials10 cited

2023Peer review before trial conduct could increase research value and reduce waste10 cited

2020In Defense of P Values9 cited

2023Clinical trial registration has become more prevalent in physical therapy but it is still inadequate: A meta-research study7 cited