Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Do randomised controlled trials relevant to pharmacy meet best practice standards for quality conduct and reporting? A systematic review

10 references·13 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
2006Bias in Clinical Intervention Research636 cited
2015Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials in Otorhinolaryngologic Literature – Adherence to the CONSORT Statement40 cited
2014Endorsement of the CONSORT guidelines, trial registration, and the quality of reporting randomised controlled trials in leading nursing journals: A cross-sectional analysis34 cited

Cited by

2021Comparing the reporting and conduct quality of exercise and pharmacological randomised controlled trials: a systematic review23 cited
2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements22 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada Statements22 cited

2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements21 cited

2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada Statements20 cited

2023Improving the Quality of Publications in and Advancing the Entire Paradigms of Clinical and Social Pharmacy Practice Research: The Granada Statements18 cited

2023Improving the Quality of Publications in and Advancing the Paradigms of Clinical and Social Pharmacy Practice Research: The Granada Statements17 cited

2023Methods and results of studies on reporting guideline adherence are poorly reported: a meta-research study17 cited

2023Mejora de la Calidad de las Publicaciones y Avance en los Paradigmas de la Investigación en Farmacia Práctica Clínica y Social: La Declaración de Granada16 cited

2021Quality of reporting and risk of bias: a review of randomised trials in occupational health14 cited

2023Mejorando la calidad de las publicaciones y avanzando en todos los paradigmas de la investigación de la farmacia asistencial, clínica y social: las declaraciones de Granada13 cited

2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada statements11 cited

2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the entire paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada statements10 cited