SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Framework for Conceptualizing Evidence Needs of Health Systems
16 references·0 citing·52 second hop
A Framework for Conceptualizing Evidence Needs of Health Systems (2017)A Framework for Conceptualizing Evidence …Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Rating the certainty in evide…Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews (2017)Fit for purpose: perspectives…AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 7: PRISMA-CI elaboration and explanation (2017)AHRQ series on complex interv…AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions (2017)AHRQ series on complex interv…The effectiveness of evidence summaries on health policymakers and health system managers use of evidence from systematic reviews: a systematic review (2016)The effectiveness of evidence…Developing and refining the methods for a ‘one-stop shop’ for research evidence about health systems (2015)Developing and refining the m…A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts (2015)A taxonomy of rapid reviews l…Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America (2014)Best care at lower cost: the …Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians (2012)Interventions to improve the …Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center (2012)Deploying an interactive mach…Observational studies in systemic reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Observational studies in syst…Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews by health policymakers and managers: A systematic review (2011)Interventions encouraging the…Reducing health inequalities in priority public health conditions: using rapid review to develop proposals for evidence-based policy (2010)Reducing health inequalities …Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications (2008)Evidence and Value: Impact on…HTA 101 INTRODUCTION TO HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2004)HTA 101 INTRODUCTION TO HEALT…The Use of Technology Assessment by Hospitals, Health Maintenance Organizations, and Third-Party Payers in the United States (1995)The Use of Technology Assessm…Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Organizational culture and leadership (1993)Understanding Psychological Safety in Health Care and Education Organizations: A Comparative Perspective (2016)Vital Directions for Health and Health Care (2017)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers’ views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access (2022)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Health Technology Assessment: Lessons Learned from Around the World—An Overview (2009)Identifying existing health care services that do not provide value for money (2009)Using health technology assessment for informing coverage decisions in Thailand (2012)Cost-effectiveness analysis. (1993)Health care technology and its assessment : an international perspective (1993)Standardizing Methodologies for Economic Evaluation in Health Care: Practice, Problems, and Potential (1993)Hospital pharmacy decisions, cost containment, and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis (1997)A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Research of Stroke Evaluation and Treatment (1999)Economic Evaluations of Healthcare Programmes and Decision Making (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers’ perceptions (2012)Assessment of Methodologic Quality of Randomized Trials of Interventional Techniques: Development of an Interventional Pain Management Specific Instrument (2014)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Improving the uptake of systematic reviews: a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and relevance (2014)The impact of Cochrane Reviews: a mixed-methods evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the National Institute for Health Research (2015)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking (2012)Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework (2017)Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations (2022)Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making (2005)PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity (2012)Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study (2018)Facilitating evidence uptake: development and user testing of a systematic review summary format to inform public health decision-making in German-speaking countries (2018)Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (2021)Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme (2006)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Using systematic reviews in guideline development: The GRADE approach (2018)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist (2017)A review of methods for addressing components of interventions in meta-analysis (2021)The Use of Music in the Treatment and Management of Serious Mental Illness: A Global Scoping Review of the Literature (2021)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools (2018)Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America1,363 cited
  • 2017Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect700 cited
  • 2012Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center530 cited
  • 2008Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications229 cited
  • 2004HTA 101 INTRODUCTION TO HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT185 cited
  • 2012Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians155 cited
  • 2017AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions125 cited
  • 2011Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews by health policymakers and managers: A systematic review93 cited
  • 2016The effectiveness of evidence summaries on health policymakers and health system managers use of evidence from systematic reviews: a systematic review92 cited
  • 1995The Use of Technology Assessment by Hospitals, Health Maintenance Organizations, and Third-Party Payers in the United States82 cited
  • 2015Developing and refining the methods for a ‘one-stop shop’ for research evidence about health systems76 cited
  • 2015A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts76 cited
  • 2011

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Observational studies in systemic reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
71 cited
  • 2017Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews65 cited
  • 2010Reducing health inequalities in priority public health conditions: using rapid review to develop proposals for evidence-based policy57 cited
  • 2017AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 7: PRISMA-CI elaboration and explanation49 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.