Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Conference abstracts describing systematic reviews on pain were selectively published, not reliable, and poorly reported

16 references·2 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
2013Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits814 cited
2017Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review768 cited
2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
2013PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts706 cited
2013Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews357 cited
2018Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts307 cited
2002AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORTHOPAEDIC ABSTRACTS AND SUBSEQUENT FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONS263 cited
2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

235 cited

2018Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update134 cited

2015Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement106 cited

2016Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study98 cited

Cited by

2020Biomedical conferences’ author instructions rarely mention guidelines for reporting abstracts of trials and systematic reviews14 cited
2023Thirty-year survey of bibliometrics used in the research literature of pain: Analysis, evolution, and pitfalls12 cited