SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Architecture of an Internal, Scientific, Presubmission Review Program Designed to Increase the Impact and Success of Grant Proposals and Manuscripts
5 references·2 citing·20 second hop
The Architecture of an Internal, Scientific, Presubmission Review Program Designed to Increase the Impact and Success of Grant Proposals and Manuscripts (2019)The Architecture of an Internal, Scientif…Introduction to the Specific Aims Page of a Grant Proposal (2018)Introduction to the Specific …More and Better Grant Proposals? The Evaluation of a Grant-Writing Group at a Mid-Sized Canadian University. (2017)More and Better Grant Proposa…To Apply or Not to Apply: A Survey Analysis of Grant Writing Costs and Benefits (2015)To Apply or Not to Apply: A S…On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers (2013)On the time spent preparing g…Writing a first grant proposal (2012)Writing a first grant proposalCompeting for research funding: Key elements impacting the evaluation of grant proposal (2024)Competing for research fundin…Why Write? (2020)Why Write?National Science Board (1952)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Research funding goes to rich clubs (2015)Toward predicting research proposal success (2017)A discourse analysis of the macro-structure, metadiscoursal and microdiscoursal features in the abstracts of research articles across multiple science disciplines (2018)Classical peer review: an empty gun (2010)Feminist scholars working around the neoliberal university (2017)Research portfolio analysis and topic prominence (2017)Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions (2019)The Science of Scientific Writing (1990)The infectiousness of pompous prose (1992)When Authorship Fails (1997)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Gender Differences in Academic Medicine: Retention, Rank, and Leadership Comparisons From the National Faculty Survey (2018)Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research (2008)Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success (2016)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)India Research Management Initiative (IRMI) – an initiative for building research capacity in India (2019)Success? Learning to Navigate the Grant Funding Genre System. (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers157 cited
  • 2015To Apply or Not to Apply: A Survey Analysis of Grant Writing Costs and Benefits74 cited
  • 2018Introduction to the Specific Aims Page of a Grant Proposal18 cited
  • 2012Writing a first grant proposal14 cited
  • 2017More and Better Grant Proposals? The Evaluation of a Grant-Writing Group at a Mid-Sized Canadian University.12 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Why Write?8 cited
  • 2024Competing for research funding: Key elements impacting the evaluation of grant proposal7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work