SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quantitative portrait of open access mega-journals
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Quantitative portrait of open access mega-journals (2019)Quantitative portrait of open access mega…Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017 (2018)Evolution of the scholarly me…Transitioning from a Conventional to a ‘Mega’ Journal: A Bibliometric Case Study of the Journal Medicine (2017)Transitioning from a Conventi…Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus (2017)Status and quality of open ac…Publishing in Predatory Open Access Journals: A Case of Iran (2017)Publishing in Predatory Open …Open-access mega-journals (2017)Open-access mega-journalsOpen access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: Operational realities) (2017)Open access megajournals: The…Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations) (2017)Open access megajournals: The…“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals (2017)“Let the community decide”? T…Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference? (2016)Peer review in megajournals c…Open-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile (2016)Open-Access Mega-Journals: A …Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth? (2015)Have the “mega-journals” reac…Characteristics of a Megajournal: A Bibliometric Case Study (2015)Characteristics of a Megajour…Changing knowledge ecologies and the transformation of the scholarly journal (2014)Changing knowledge ecologies …A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals (2014)A survey of authors publishin…Open access megajournals : have they changed everything? (2013)Open access megajournals : ha…Developing Open Access Journals: A Practical Guide (2008)Developing Open Access Journa…A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals (2018)Methods to account for citation inflation in research evaluation (2019)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)Developing an effective market for Open A APC (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence (2017)The archaeology of knowledge ; and, The discourse on language (1972)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)4 What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (2012)Interpreting Evidence-of-Learning: Educational research in the era of big data (2015)Adding Sense (2020)The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models (2020)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Scientific peer review (2011)Bias in peer review (2012)Publishing speed and acceptance rates of open access megajournals (2018)Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open‐access mega‐journal authors: Results of a large‐scale survey (2019)Innovative Strategies for Peer Review (2020)Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Anatomy of green open access (2013)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network (2018)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2020)Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review (2023)Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability (2002)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach (2022)Productivity and Impact of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-Related Academic Research: A Bibliometric Analysis (2023)Peer Review in the Age of Generative AI (2024)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Evaluation of untrustworthy journals: Transition from formal criteria to a complex view (2020)Predatory Conferences: What Are the Signs? (2021)Predatory Journals- The Power of the Predator Versus the Integrity of the Honest (2021)Open Access (2012)Adoption of the Open Access Business Model in Scientific Journal Publishing: A Cross-disciplinary Study (2020)Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study of Hungary (2022)The Rapid Growth of Mega-Journals (2023)Megajournal mismanagement: Manuscript decision bias and anomalous editor activity at PLOS ONE (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth?151 cited
  • 2017Open-access mega-journals138 cited
  • 2016Open-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile89 cited
  • 2014A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals84 cited
  • 2018Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–201766 cited
  • 2017“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals59 cited
  • 2016Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference?56 cited
  • 2014Changing knowledge ecologies and the transformation of the scholarly journal46 cited
  • 2017Publishing in Predatory Open Access Journals: A Case of Iran40 cited
  • 2013Open access megajournals : have they changed everything?39 cited
  • 2017Transitioning from a Conventional to a ‘Mega’ Journal: A Bibliometric Case Study of the Journal Medicine29 cited
  • 2017Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus28 cited
  • 2017Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: Operational realities)26 cited
  • 2015Characteristics of a Megajournal: A Bibliometric Case Study25 cited
  • 2017Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations)

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

24 cited
  • 2008Developing Open Access Journals: A Practical Guide20 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.