SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Retina and Vitreous Conditions
15 references·5 citing·47 second hop
Evaluation of Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Retina and Vitreous Conditions (2019)Evaluation of Systematic Reviews of Inter…Replication, Duplication, and Waste in a Quarter Million Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2018)Replication, Duplication, and…How to avoid common problems when using ClinicalTrials.gov in research: 10 issues to consider (2018)How to avoid common problems …The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews (2017)The quality of systematic rev…Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews (2016)Impact of librarians on repor…Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews (2015)Librarian co-authors correlat…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study (2013)ClinicalTrials.gov registrati…Metabias: A Challenge for Comparative Effectiveness Research (2011)Metabias: A Challenge for Com…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…A General Framework for the Evaluation of Clinical Trial Quality (2009)A General Framework for the E…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. (2005)Systematic reviews need syste…How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)How important are comprehensi…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…Investigate the relationship between the retraction reasons and the quality of methodology in non-Cochrane retracted systematic reviews: a systematic review (2024)Investigate the relationship …The case of the disappearing librarians: analyzing documentation of librarians’ contributions to systematic reviews (2023)The case of the disappearing …TFOS Lifestyle - Evidence quality report: Advancing the evaluation and synthesis of research evidence (2023)TFOS Lifestyle - Evidence qua…Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses of acupuncture for patients with migraine: A methodological investigation with evidence map (2022)Reporting and methodological …Authorship diversity among systematic reviews in eyes and vision (2020)Authorship diversity among sy…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: A 12 step guideline for authors (2012)Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough (2013)Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence (2012)Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2012)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors (2015)Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval (2019)Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)The Delphi List (1998)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Complementary religious and spiritual interventions in physical health and quality of life: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials (2017)Critical appraisal of nonrandomized studies—A review of recommended and commonly used tools (2018)The effectiveness of various computer-based interventions for patients with chronic pain or functional somatic syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Is This Clinical Trial Fully Registered? — A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2005)Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis (2012)Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established (2017)Availability of study protocols for randomized trials published in high-impact medical journals: A cross-sectional analysis (2019)Research waste in surgical randomized controlled trials (2019)Searching clinical trials registers: guide for systematic reviewers (2022)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 2003How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study1,181 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2015Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews330 cited
  • 2005Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.257 cited
  • 2009A General Framework for the Evaluation of Clinical Trial Quality251 cited
  • 2018How to avoid common problems when using ClinicalTrials.gov in research: 10 issues to consider189 cited
  • 2016Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews108 cited
  • 2018Replication, Duplication, and Waste in a Quarter Million Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses73 cited
  • 2011Metabias: A Challenge for Comparative Effectiveness Research67 cited
  • 2013

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study
31 cited
  • 2017The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews28 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023TFOS Lifestyle - Evidence quality report: Advancing the evaluation and synthesis of research evidence18 cited
    • 2022Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses of acupuncture for patients with migraine: A methodological investigation with evidence map16 cited
    • 2020Authorship diversity among systematic reviews in eyes and vision15 cited
    • 2023The case of the disappearing librarians: analyzing documentation of librarians’ contributions to systematic reviews15 cited
    • 2024Investigate the relationship between the retraction reasons and the quality of methodology in non-Cochrane retracted systematic reviews: a systematic review14 cited