SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scholarly Open‐Access Publishing
9 references·0 citing·35 second hop
Scholarly Open‐Access Publishing (2019)Scholarly Open‐Access PublishingFormat Aside: Applying Beall's Criteria to Assess the Predatory Nature of both OA and Non-OA Library and Information Science Journals (2018)Format Aside: Applying Beall'…Predatory publishers: Implications for pharmacy practice and practitioners (2017)Predatory publishers: Implica…Predatory Journals Threaten the Quality of Published Medical Research (2017)Predatory Journals Threaten t…Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals (2016)Medical publishing and the th…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?The Continued Movement for Open Access to Peer-Reviewed Literature (2013)The Continued Movement for Op…Avoiding the Peril of Publishing Qualitative Scholarship in Predatory Journals. (2013)Avoiding the Peril of Publish…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The Development of Open Acces…The Eigenfactor MetricsTM: A Network Approach to Assessing Scholarly Journals (2010)The Eigenfactor MetricsTM: A …Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification (1972)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)P‐Rank: An indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks (2010)Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality (2015)The Social Media Index: Measuring the Impact of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Websites (2015)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)One year of unsolicited e-mails: The modus operandi of predatory journals and publishers (2021)The Rise of Platinum Open Access Journals with Both Impact Factors and Zero Article Processing Charges (2022)Uncovering the trends and developments in subscription business models through bibliometric analysis (2023)“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers (2010)Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada (2016)Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals (2016)Open Access: Concepts, findings, and recommendations for stakeholders in dentistry (2017)Predatory journals exploit structural weaknesses in scholarly publishing (2018)Burden and Characteristics of Unsolicited Emails from Medical/Scientific Journals, Conferences, and Webinars to Faculty and Trainees at an Academic Pathology Department (2019)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited (2020)How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis (2020)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)Study of Predatory Open Access Nursing Journals (2016)What I learned from predatory publishers (2017)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Open Access and Promotion and Tenure Evaluation Plans at the University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire (2017)Investigating academic library responses to predatory publishing in the United States, Canada and Spanish-speaking Latin America (2020)Knowledge and Influence of Predatory Journals in Dermatology: A Pan-Austrian Survey (2018)Predatory publishing and cybercrime targeting academics (2018)Predatory journals: Perception, impact and use of Beall’s list by the scientific community–A bibliometric big data study (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2011The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009753 cited
  • 2010The Eigenfactor MetricsTM: A Network Approach to Assessing Scholarly Journals179 cited
  • 2018Format Aside: Applying Beall's Criteria to Assess the Predatory Nature of both OA and Non-OA Library and Information Science Journals65 cited
  • 2017Predatory Journals Threaten the Quality of Published Medical Research35 cited
  • 2016Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals28 cited
  • 2013The Continued Movement for Open Access to Peer-Reviewed Literature28 cited
  • 2013Avoiding the Peril of Publishing Qualitative Scholarship in Predatory Journals.18 cited
  • 2017Predatory publishers: Implications for pharmacy practice and practitioners11 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work