SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Communicating forensic scientific expertise: An analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Communicating forensic scientific expertise: An analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts (2019)Communicating forensic scientific experti…Two Strategies for Qualitative Content Analysis: An Intramethod Approach to Triangulation (2018)Two Strategies for Qualitativ…Communicating Opinion Evidence in the Forensic Identification Sciences: Accuracy and Impact (2017)Communicating Opinion Evidenc…A systematic analysis of misleading evidence in unsafe rulings in England and Wales (2017)A systematic analysis of misl…Model forensic science (2016)Model forensic scienceDevelopment of European standards for evaluative reporting in forensic science (2016)Development of European stand…The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: Verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect. (2013)The expression and interpreta…Understanding of forensic expert reports by judges, defense lawyers and forensic professionals (2010)Understanding of forensic exp…The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear. (2009)The testimony of forensic ide…Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Scienc…Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Strengthening forensic scienc…Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions (2009)Invalid Forensic Science Test…Just Evidence: The Limits of Science in the Legal Process (2006)Just Evidence: The Limits of …Scripting Expertise: The History of Handwriting Identification Evidence and the Judicial Construction of Reliability (2001)Scripting Expertise: The Hist…Contested Identities (1998)Contested IdentitiesUsing Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. (1991)Using Kintsch's computational…Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)Interpretation of statistical…Conceptual Information Processing (1975)Toward a model of text comprehension and production. (1978)Prose Comprehension beyond the Word (1982)Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation (1998)Reopening Inquiry into Cognitive Processes in Writing-To-Learn (1999)Evolution of human cognitive architecture (2003)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Professional Vision (1994)The New Production of Knowledge (1994)Roboethics: Social and Ethical Implications of Robotics (2008)Speaking Power to “Post-Truth”: Critical Political Ecology and the New Authoritarianism (2019)Testing future societies? Developing a framework for test beds and living labs as instruments of innovation governance (2019)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? (1999)Communicating Statistical Information (2000)Do confessions taint perceptions of handwriting evidence? An empirical test of the forensic confirmation bias. (2013)On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect (2014)Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches (1981)Modern scientific evidence : the law and science of expert testimony (2006)Violent Street Crime Versus Harmful White-Collar Crime: A Comparison of Perceived Seriousness and Punitiveness (2015)Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings (2016)Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis (2019)Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment (1971)On the psychology of prediction. (1973)New directions in attribution research (1976)Naked statistical evidence of liability: Is subjective probability enough? (1992)The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements (2000)The ‘Heuristics and Biases’ Bias in Expert Elicitation (2007)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Triangulation: A Method to Increase Validity, Reliability, and Legitimation in Clinical Research (2019)Pragmatism and Methodology (2024)The Role of Triangulation in Qualitative Research (2024)The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (2025)Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide. (2013)(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science (2020)Helping with inquiries or helping with profits? The trials and tribulations of a technology of forensic reasoning (2010)Equal before the Law (2012)Pure Corpses, Dangerous Citizens: Transgressing the Boundaries between Experts and Mourners in the Search for the Disappeared in Mexico (2016)Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions (2011)Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them? (2013)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
  • 2009Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward957 cited
  • 1987Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.407 cited
  • 2018Two Strategies for Qualitative Content Analysis: An Intramethod Approach to Triangulation372 cited
  • 1991Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures.327 cited
  • 2006Just Evidence: The Limits of Science in the Legal Process166 cited
  • 2009Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions133 cited
  • 2009The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.102 cited
  • 2013The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: Verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect.90 cited
  • 1998Contested Identities81 cited
  • 2017A systematic analysis of misleading evidence in unsafe rulings in England and Wales67 cited
  • 2010Understanding of forensic expert reports by judges, defense lawyers and forensic professionals63 cited
  • 2016Model forensic science60 cited
  • 2001Scripting Expertise: The History of Handwriting Identification Evidence and the Judicial Construction of Reliability

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

59 cited
  • 2017Communicating Opinion Evidence in the Forensic Identification Sciences: Accuracy and Impact39 cited
  • 2016Development of European standards for evaluative reporting in forensic science34 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.