SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research
12 references·3 citing·46 second hop
Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research (2019)Core outcomes in neonatology: development…Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (2018)Global, regional, and nationa…The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1…Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement (2016)Core Outcome Set–STAndards fo…Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)Developing Core Outcome Measu…Systematic Cochrane Reviews in Neonatology: A Critical Appraisal (2013)Systematic Cochrane Reviews i…Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups (2013)Can a core outcome set improv…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies (2011)Using the Delphi Technique to…Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires (2009)Methods to increase response …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Understanding randomised controlled trials (2005)Understanding randomised cont…An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)An Experimental Application o…Blinding Assessments in Neonatal Ventilation Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Meta-Epidemiological Review (2024)Blinding Assessments in Neona…The future of Cochrane Neonatal (2020)The future of Cochrane Neonat…A core outcome set for pre‐eclampsia research: an international consensus development study (2020)A core outcome set for pre‐ec…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Web-based Questionnaires: The Future in Epidemiology? (2010)Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches (2012)Global Overview of Response Rates in Patient and Health Care Professional Surveys in Surgery (2020)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review (2017)The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus (2020)Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements (2021)Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes (1995)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain (2015)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey (2017)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2005)Gamification and Adherence to Web-Based Mental Health Interventions: A Systematic Review (2016)Psychosocial Health Interventions by Social Robots: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2019)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study (2017)A Core Outcome Set for Multimorbidity Research (COSmm) (2018)Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement (2019)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations (2017)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 (2016)Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 (2016)Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (2018)The State of US Health, 1990-2016 (2018)Global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (2020)Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 (2024)The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis (1999)The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications (2004)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1963An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts6,052 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
  • 2018Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 20174,086 cited
  • 2017The COMET Handbook: version 1.02,006 cited
  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2009Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires1,379 cited
  • 2011Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies891 cited
  • 2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0781 cited
  • 2016Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement650 cited
  • 2005Understanding randomised controlled trials458 cited
  • 2013Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups183 cited
  • 2013Systematic Cochrane Reviews in Neonatology: A Critical Appraisal45 cited

Cited by

  • 2020A core outcome set for pre‐eclampsia research: an international consensus development study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

155 cited
  • 2020The future of Cochrane Neonatal23 cited
  • 2024Blinding Assessments in Neonatal Ventilation Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Meta-Epidemiological Review14 cited