SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A importância da Ciência Aberta (Open Science) na pesquisa em Administração
5 references·2 citing·33 second hop
A importância da Ciência Aberta (Open Science) na pesquisa em Administração (2019)A importância da Ciência Aberta (Open Sci…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune (2017)Science’s reproducibility and…Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings (2017)Is there a credibility crisis…How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)How open science helps resear…A century of trends in adult human height (2016)A century of trends in adult …Diálogos para uma prática científica mais coletiva (2023)Diálogos para uma prática cie…A Impossibilidade da Ciência Aberta sem Alteridade e Pluralidade Epistêmica (2021)A Impossibilidade da Ciência …A History of the Study of Human Growth (1982)Health nutrition and economic development. (1995)Gaussian Markov Random Fields (2005)Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: projections with a Bayesian model ensemble (2017)Acting on non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income tropical countries (2018)Knowing Ourselves Together: The Cultural Origins of Metacognition (2020)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python (2011)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Replications in Psychology Research (2012)The Chrysalis Effect (2014)Advancing Theory by Assessing Boundary Conditions With Metaregression: A Critical Review and Best-Practice Recommendations (2017)Best Practices in Data Collection and Preparation: Recommendations for Reviewers, Editors, and Authors (2019)Survey response rates: Trends and a validity assessment framework (2022)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Building Transparency and Trustworthiness in Inductive Research Through Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software (2019)On the future of international joint venture research (2019)Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality (2020)Qualitative Research Studying How Things Work (2011)Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2015)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science (2020)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Da publicação acadêmica à divulgação científica (2021)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016A century of trends in adult human height1,552 cited
  • 2016How open science helps researchers succeed790 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review232 cited
  • 2017Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings183 cited
  • 2017Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune163 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Diálogos para uma prática científica mais coletiva9 cited
  • 2021A Impossibilidade da Ciência Aberta sem Alteridade e Pluralidade Epistêmica6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work