SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Awareness of predatory journals and open access among medical oncologists: results of an online survey
8 references·10 citing·41 second hop
Awareness of predatory journals and open access among medical oncologists: results of an online survey (2019)Awareness of predatory journals and open …Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Problems and challenges of pr…The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology (2017)The surge of predatory open-a…PubMed should raise the bar for journal inclusion (2017)PubMed should raise the bar f…Controversial website that lists ‘predatory’ publishers shuts down (2017)Controversial website that li…Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Growth rates of modern scienc…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?A Study of Innovative Features in Scholarly Open Access Journals (2011)A Study of Innovative Feature…The pros and cons of open peer review (2006)The pros and cons of open pee…Predatory publishing in medical education: a rapid scoping review (2024)Predatory publishing in medic…Awareness of Jordanian Researchers About Predatory Journals: A Need for Training (2024)Awareness of Jordanian Resear…Predatory journals: Perception, impact and use of Beall’s list by the scientific community–A bibliometric big data study (2023)Predatory journals: Perceptio…Effect of an educational intervention on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare workers at King Hussein Cancer Center towards predatory publishers (2023)Effect of an educational inte…Development and validation of an instrument to assess the knowledge and perceptions of predatory journals (2023)Development and validation of…Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles (2022)Authors publishing repeatedly…A longitudinal study of the evolution of opinions about open access and its main features: a twitter sentiment analysis (2022)A longitudinal study of the e…Awareness of predatory journals and open access publishing among orthopaedic and trauma surgeons – results from an online survey in Germany (2021)Awareness of predatory journa…“Evidence-based checklists” for identifying predatory journals have not been assessed for reliability or validity: An analysis and proposal for moving forward (2021)“Evidence-based checklists” f…Awareness of predatory publishing (2020)Awareness of predatory publis…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Scientific peer review (2011)The natural selection of bad science (2016)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change (1998)Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation (2009)Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation (2009)Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering (2013)Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication (2015)Do open access journal articles experience a citation advantage? Results and methodological reflections of an application of multiple measures to an analysis by WoS subject areas (2020)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Is Predatory Publishing a Real Threat? Evidence from a Large Database Study (2017)Predatory Open-Access Publishing in Anesthesiology (2018)Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases (2019)Ban predators from the scientific record (2016)Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation (2017)Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers (2019)How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis (2020)Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding (2020)Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing (2013)Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals (2017)Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus (2016)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Diagnosis Reliability of ChatGPT for Journal Evaluation (2023)Never mind predatory publishers… what about ‘grey’ publishers? (2023)‘Special issue-ization’ as a growth and revenue strategy: Reproduction by the “big five” and the risks for research integrity (2024)Improving the Peer Review Process: A Proposed Market System (2016)Assessment Strategies for Online Learning: Engagement and Authenticity (2018)Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research (2019)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Identifying publications in questionable journals in the context of performance-based research funding (2019)Predatory journals: Authors and readers beware. (2019)Beall's legacy in the battle against predatory publishers (2021)Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review (2020)Big data analytics in manufacturing: a bibliometric analysis of research in the field of business management (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,570 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2018Problems and challenges of predatory journals227 cited
  • 2017The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology97 cited
  • 2011A Study of Innovative Features in Scholarly Open Access Journals82 cited
  • 2017Controversial website that lists ‘predatory’ publishers shuts down57 cited
  • 2006The pros and cons of open peer review56 cited
  • 2017PubMed should raise the bar for journal inclusion48 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Awareness of predatory journals and open access publishing among orthopaedic and trauma surgeons – results from an online survey in Germany31 cited
  • 2022Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles31 cited
  • 2023Predatory journals: Perception, impact and use of Beall’s list by the scientific community–A bibliometric big data study26 cited
  • 2021“Evidence-based checklists” for identifying predatory journals have not been assessed for reliability or validity: An analysis and proposal for moving forward24 cited
  • 2024Predatory publishing in medical education: a rapid scoping review24 cited
  • 2023Development and validation of an instrument to assess the knowledge and perceptions of predatory journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

22 cited
  • 2023Effect of an educational intervention on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare workers at King Hussein Cancer Center towards predatory publishers9 cited
  • 2022A longitudinal study of the evolution of opinions about open access and its main features: a twitter sentiment analysis9 cited
  • 2020Awareness of predatory publishing8 cited
  • 2024Awareness of Jordanian Researchers About Predatory Journals: A Need for Training8 cited