Improving Bibliographic Coupling with Category-Based Cocitation

Abstract

Bibliographic coupling (BC) is a similarity measure for scientific articles. It works based on an expectation that two articles that cite a similar set of references may focus on related (or even the same) research issues. For analysis and mapping of scientific literature, BC is an essential measure, and it can also be integrated with different kinds of measures. Further improvement of BC is thus of both practical and technical significance. In this paper, we propose a novel measure that improves BC by tackling its main weakness: two related articles may still cite different references. Category-based cocitation (category-based CC) is proposed to estimate how these different references are related to each other, based on the assumption that two different references may be related if they are cited by articles in the same categories about specific topics. The proposed measure is thus named BCCCC (Bibliographic Coupling with Category-based Cocitation). Performance of BCCCC is evaluated by experimentation and case study. The results show that BCCCC performs significantly better than state-of-the-art variants of BC in identifying highly related articles, which report conclusive results on the same specific topics. An experiment also shows that BCCCC provides helpful information to further improve a biomedical search engine. BCCCC is thus an enhanced version of BC, which is a fundamental measure for retrieval and analysis of scientific literature.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.