SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The fate of urological systematic reviews registered in PROSPERO · Study

ReviewThe fate of urological systematic reviews registered in PROSPERO

Sari Safaa Khaleel2019

Review2019

The fate of urological systematic reviews registered in PROSPERO

Sari Safaa Khaleel · Brent E. Cleveland · Arveen A. Kalapara · Niranjan Jude Sathianathen · Priyamvadha Balaji · Philipp Dahm

8 citations·0/0 files stored·World Journal of Urology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Publishing and Open Access Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses 2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2020Questions and answers about conducting systematic reviews in sport and exercise psychologyreview · 8 shared references 2020Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistryreview · 7 shared references 2021Characteristics, quality and volume of the first 5 months of the COVID-19 evidence synthesis infodemic: a meta-research studyreview · 7 shared references 2021Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients—A methodological studyreview · 7 shared references 2021Methodologies for systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials in pain, anaesthesia, and perioperative medicinereview · 7 shared references 2018Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and countingreview · 6 shared references

Details

Year2019

Typereview

Published2019-11-29

VenueWorld Journal of Urology

ISSN-L0724-4983

Languageen

Citations8

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s00345-019-03032-x

openalex_workW2990826255

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.