Constituting shared workspaces

Abstract

This chapter takes up the problem of relations between lived work practices and the material environments they inhabit, animate, provide for the significance of, and rely upon (see also Goodwin & Goodwin, this volume). More particularly, the goal is to come to terms with a single case of the moment-to-moment, interactionally achieved production of shared workspaces in the service of joint work. The starting premise is that work activities and workspaces are mutually constituted, in ways that are structured and available for detailed understanding. At the same time, there is an ordering between the two, in that parties engaged in work are not concerned equally with the constitution of the place of their work and with its objects and outcomes. Rather, when all goes well, the former is taken by participants to be a previously given, largely transparent background for the work at hand. To gain insight into the material basis of the structuring of work practices and the practical bases for the structuring of work materials, therefore, requires a closer look. Lynch has argued (1991) that the physical place of a worksite comprises a complex of equipment and action, of spatial orders produced in and informed by the knowledgeable practices of setting members. Taking up from Shapin the question of the “siting of knowledge production,” he urges an inquiry into the scientific laboratory as “an ecology of local spaces integrated within disciplinary practices” (ibid., p. 74).

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 228 citations exist upstream.