The limited efficacy of 3D models for teaching students sex estimations based on cranial traits: A case for investment in osteology teaching labs

Abstract

Abstract The use of 3D digital imaging methods has increased within biological anthropology and medical research. Although digital renderings can be easily shared by researchers or used for student learning modules in osteology, limitations to using 3D models exist, requiring institutions of higher learning to invest in real bones or casts of human skeletal remains for labs. Here, we examine whether 3D digital models are viable proxies for real bones by testing the reliability of scoring sexually dimorphic traits of the human skull, a method commonly used by North American skeletal biologists. Forty‐five crania from Peruvian archaeological sites were used to score four sexually dimorphic cranial traits. These morphological traits were scored by one student learning osteology and an experienced researcher using the actual crania and 3D models of the same individuals. Statistical tests of rater agreement and strength of the agreement were conducted. Results showed lower agreement between the actual and 3D scores for the student and higher agreement among the scores for the experienced researcher. Accurate and cost‐effective 3D models can serve as excellent replacements for real skeletal remains when researchers are experienced. However, 3D models may be a less reliable training tool for students learning osteological methods that require palpating areas of the human cranium. This study makes a strong case for purchasing quality casts or real human skeletal remains of legal/ethical origin for osteology teaching labs, despite their higher costs.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.