Faculty online learning communities: A model for sustained teaching transformation

Abstract

Many physics faculty are aware of and interested in using research-based instructional strategies.However, knowledge and motivation are not sufficient to support successful and sustained adoption.To address this problem, we present a faculty online learning community (FOLC) model for educational change and describe its application (the New Faculty Workshop FOLC, NFW-FOLC) to provide a year of support to new faculty following attendance at the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop.FOLCs are an extension of the faculty learning community model.Here we present the theoretical underpinnings of the general FOLC model, the design principles of our particular NFW-FOLCs, and the learning objectives for NFW-FOLC participants.We demonstrate the efficacy of our NFW-FOLCs by analyzing postexperience interviews with participants from the first four NFW-FOLC cohorts.The primary motivation given by faculty for joining our FOLCs is to improve their teaching as they learn more about teaching strategies, get implementation help, and connect to a broader community.These motivations align with our NFW-FOLC design principles.Participants overwhelmingly report the experience was valuable and impacted them positively with the most commonly reported impacts of NFW-FOLC membership being changes in their implementation of teaching strategies, increased reflection about teaching, increased confidence as teachers, increased knowledge about teaching, benefits to their students, time saved, and gaining a resource.The reported impacts provide evidence that the NFW-FOLC is successfully meeting its goals.We argue that the reported impacts are uniquely supported by the FOLC model of professional development.We advance FOLCs as a generalizable model of professional development offering a number of advantages over traditional reform efforts as well as traditional Faculty Learning Communities.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 53 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.