SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Applications of, and Experiences with, the Norwegian Model in Finland
3 references·3 citing·21 second hop
Applications of, and Experiences with, the Norwegian Model in Finland (2018)Applications of, and Experiences with, th…Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey (2018)Comprehensiveness of national…Research Performance Based Funding Systems: a Comparative Assessment (2016)Research Performance Based Fu…Expert-based versus citation-based ranking of scholarly and scientific publication channels (2016)Expert-based versus citation-…Research performance and scholarly communication profile of competitive research funding: the case of Academy of Finland (2022)Research performance and scho…The use of gold open access in four European countries : an analysis at the level of articles (2019)The use of gold open access i…Ambiguity in identification of peer-reviewed publications in the Finnish and Flemish performance-based research funding systems (2019)Ambiguity in identification o…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods (2004)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact? (2017)Can we automate expert-based journal rankings? Analysis of the Finnish publication indicator (2020)Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in national journal rankings in China and Europe (2022)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Frascati Manual 2015 (2015)The Flemish Performance-based Research Funding System: A Unique Variant of the Norwegian Model (2018)Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines (2019)Professional standards in bibliometric research evaluation? A meta-evaluation of European assessment practice 2005–2019 (2020)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals at the European and World Levels—1996–2013 (2014)Open access journal publishing in the Nordic countries (2019)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Russian experience with national rankings of academic journals: Mistakes, challenges, and prospects (2023)Unique, but still best practice? The Research Excellence Framework (REF) from an international perspective (2017)Research governance and the future(s) of research assessment (2019)The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF Research Grants (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Research Performance Based Funding Systems: a Comparative Assessment96 cited
  • 2018Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey70 cited
  • 2016Expert-based versus citation-based ranking of scholarly and scientific publication channels47 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Research performance and scholarly communication profile of competitive research funding: the case of Academy of Finland15 cited
  • 2019The use of gold open access in four European countries : an analysis at the level of articles12 cited
  • 2019Ambiguity in identification of peer-reviewed publications in the Finnish and Flemish performance-based research funding systems12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work