References

• 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
• 2016Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level499 cited
• 2014Gender Differences in Publication Productivity, Academic Position, Career Duration, and Funding Among U.S. Academic Radiation Oncology Faculty205 cited
• 2005Not-so-deep impact138 cited
• 2013The Association between Scholarly Impact and National Institutes of Health Funding in Ophthalmology95 cited
• 2013Is There a Relationship between National Institutes of Health Funding and Research Impact on Academic Urology?84 cited
• 2017Strategies for Building Peer Surgical Coaching Relationships58 cited
• 2018Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio, a New National Institutes of Health–Supported Bibliometric Measure of Research Productivity, among Academic Radiation Oncologists43 cited
• 2017A critical evaluation of the algorithm behind the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)42 cited
• 2017Research Integrity, Academic Promotion, and Attribution of Authorship and Nonauthor Contributions40 cited
• 2013Impact fact‐or fiction?36 cited
• 2012Factors affecting career choice among the next generation of academic vascular surgeons27 cited
• 2013The maze of impact metrics13 cited

Cited by