WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL POLICY

Edwin Amenta

125 citations0/0 files storedCambridge University Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Social Policy and Reform Studies Social and Political Issues Policy Transfer and Learning

Abstract

In 1975, two important quantitative comparative analyses of social policy were published. Harold Wilensky's The Welfare State and Equality addressed the differences in social spending efforts among sixty-odd countries in the 1960s and found that the level of economic development and the age of populations accounted for most of the variance in efforts. This study was the best and latest in a series of cross-sectional analyses of countries and American states that suggested that economic and social modernization processes determined social policy (review in Skocpol and Amenta 1986). The second study, David Collier and Richard Messick's “Prerequisites versus Diffusion: Testing Alternative Explanations of Social Security Adoption,” examined a similar group of countries, but with a wider time horizon, and addressed the adoption of social insurance policies. Their findings cast serious doubt on the modernization hypothesis, as well as on the strategy of generalizing from studies of many countries on social spending at a single point in time. Just a year earlier, Hugh Heclo had published Modern Social Politics and Britain and Sweden , one of the first studies to take a comparative and historical approach to the development of social policy. In the generation since then, we have learned a great deal about social policy – largely through comparative and historical work of the small- N variety. On the empirical side, we have learned when various countries adopted social programs, when these programs were expanded or contracted, the forms that social policy has taken, when countries completed their systems of social policy, differences in social spending among countries at different points in time, and which countries have seen significant retrenchment in social policy of what sort.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 125 citations exist upstream.

References

1990The three worlds of welfare capitalism 2000Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics 1994Designing Social Inquiry 1999Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies 2000Path dependence in historical sociology 1999HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS 1971Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method 1992Historical institutionalism in comparative politics

Cited by

2014Determinants of a Silent (R)evolution: Understanding the Expansion of Family Policy in Rich OECD Countries 2015Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science 2008Redistributive Conflict and Social Policy in Latin America 2012Social Policy and State Revenues in Mineral-Rich Contexts 2014Institutional politics, power constellations, and urban social sustainability: A comparative-historical analysis

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.