SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines
16 references·1 citing·33 second hop
Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines (2019)Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic …Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist (2019)Reporting items for systemati…The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar (2017)The methodological and report…CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration (2017)CONSORT Extension for Chinese…Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Better reporting of intervent…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research (2008)Helping editors, peer reviewe…Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research (2008)Enhancing the quality and tra…The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China (2007)The Quality of Reporting of R…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence (1997)Systematic Reviews: Critical …Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (1995)Predictive ability of meta-an…Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language (2021)Clinical Epidemiology in Chin…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes: a review (2006)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document (2017)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials with Traditional Chinese Medicine 2018: Recommendations, Explanation and Elaboration (SPIRIT-TCM Extension 2018) (2018)PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicines 2020 (PRISMA-CHM 2020) (2020)CLARIFY 2021: explanation and elaboration of the Delphi-based guidelines for the reporting of yoga research (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' (2008)Reporting Standards for a Bland–Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews (2020)Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol (2021)Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2014Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide10,521 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 2008Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research332 cited
  • 2017CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration326 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence262 cited
  • 2017The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar248 cited
  • 1995Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials225 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2008
Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
153 cited
  • 2019Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist145 cited
  • 2007The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China140 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language17 cited