Sukuk: Global Issues and Challenges

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this paper is to describe the differences between Sukuk and conventional bonds and discuss issues concerning accounting, recognition, measurement and disclosures in the financial statements. Currently most of the Sukuk issuers are Islamic financial institutions, but others including Singapore and the European countries are also joining the band-wagon to capture the capital-flows from the Middle Eastern countries. A number of issues are discussed in this paper; among them include recognition, measurement and disclosure of Sukuk according to two different international accounting standards. The possibility of harmonization of between IFRS for financial instruments and AAOIFI standard on investment is also discussed. The comparative analysis shows that there are not major differences between IFRS and AAOIFI standards as per recognition, measurement and disclosures of Sukuk, and therefore IFRS can be adopted by issuers worldwide for international comparability of financial statements. Global challenges and opportunities facing Sukuk are also discussed in this paper along with some recommendations on how to overcome them.INTRODUCTIONIslamic finance is gaining popularity worldwide for more than three decades and demand for Islamic financial instruments is also growing rapidly. Among the Islamic financial instruments, Sukuk has become the main attraction among banks, corporations and customers. Sukuk is the Islamic asset-backed financial instrument issued by Islamic financial institutions according to the Shari'ah.Although it is commonly referred to as Islamic bonds similar to conventional bonds, they, however, are not the same. Sukuk is not the counterpart of conventional bonds as commonly referred to in many articles. Conventional bonds are interest bearing debt instruments, but Sukuk, on the other hand, are assets-backed financial instruments. Sukuk are not interest bearing financial instruments but rather Sukuk holders have a right of ownership in the assets or properties of the corporation or the issuer (Vishwanath & Sabahuddin, 2009). Interest is forbidden in Islam so Sukuk does not bear interest to the holders, but they have a right to the profit made by the company. Losses are also to be shared among the Sukuk holders and the issuer according to the contract between the two parties.The basic principle behind the Sukuk is that the holder has an undivided ownership interest in a particular asset and is therefore entitled to the return generated by that asset. The classic Sukuk structure involves an acquisition of a property asset by a special purpose company (SPC). The SPC funds itself by the issue of Sukuk, declaring a trust in favor of the Sukuk holders. The Sukuk holders then receive a return based on the rental income of the asset (Wilson, 2008a).Sukuk therefore are considered as certificates of equal value that represent an ownership interest in tangible assets. The Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) based in Bahrain has issued guidelines that emphasize the differences between Sukuk and conventional bonds. AAOIFI is mainly responsible for formulating and implementing international Islamic finance standards in the market. Currently AAOIFI has issued 85 standards and is supported by 200 institutional members (http://www.aaoifi.com/).There are 14 different types of Sukuk described as permissible in the AAOIFI Shari'a standard 17 Investment Sukuk. Muhammad Taqi Usmani, Chairman of the Shariah Council, outlines the following differences between Sukuk and the conventional bonds. First, bonds do not represent ownership on the part of the bond holders in the enterprises for which the bonds were issued. Rather, they document the interest-bearing debt owed to the holders of the bonds. Second, regular interest payments are made to the bond holders. The amount of interest is determined as a percentage of the capital and not as a percentage of actual profits. …

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.