SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Low replicability can support robust and efficient science
16 references·16 citing·36 second hopsampled
Low replicability can support robust and efficient science (2020)Low replicability can support robust and …The preregistration revolution (2018)The preregistration revolutionEvaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Evaluating the replicability …Redefine statistical significance (2017)Redefine statistical signific…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication (2014)The Alleged Crisis and the Il…Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Increasing value and reducing…How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How to Make More Published Re…Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories (2012)A Vast Graveyard of Undead Th…Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). (2011)Why psychologists must change…Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)Publication bias in psycholog…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyAvoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform (2025)The misalignment of incentive…How can we make sound replication decisions? (2025)How can we make sound replica…The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)The replication crisis has le…Questionable Metascience Practices (2023)Questionable Metascience Prac…Modelling Scientific Communities (2023)Modelling Scientific Communit…Methodological Pluralism and the Pursuit of the Public Good (2023)Methodological Pluralism and …Is Social Work Research in Crisis? (2023)Is Social Work Research in Cr…Theoretical false positive psychology (2022)Theoretical false positive ps…The Problem of Irreproducible Bioscience Research (2022)The Problem of Irreproducible…The advice less taken: The consequences of receiving unexpected advice (2022)The advice less taken: The co…The Science of Open (Communication) Science: Toward an Evidence-Driven Understanding of Quality Criteria in Communication Research (2021)The Science of Open (Communic…Estimating the reproducibility of psychotherapy effects in mood and anxiety disorders: the possible utility of multicenter trials (2021)Estimating the reproducibilit…Disconnected psychology and neuroscience—implications for scientific progress, replicability and the role of publishing (2021)Disconnected psychology and n…Deciding what to replicate: A decision model for replication study selection under resource and knowledge constraints. (2021)Deciding what to replicate: A…Science is not a signal detection problem (2020)Science is not a signal detec…Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability (2020)Questionable research practic…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)“Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI (2021)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Sample Size Justification (2022)Strong Inference (1964)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)Scientific Utopia (2012)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The New Statistics (2013)Reproducibility in Science (2014)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2017Redefine statistical significance2,771 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
  • 2018The preregistration revolution1,972 cited
  • 2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis1,597 cited
  • 2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 20151,519 cited
  • 2011Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011).977 cited
  • 2014How to Make More Published Research True757 cited
  • 2012A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories603 cited
  • 2014The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication597 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2011
Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
493 cited

Cited by

  • 2023The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes137 cited
  • 2021Deciding what to replicate: A decision model for replication study selection under resource and knowledge constraints.85 cited
  • 2020Science is not a signal detection problem56 cited
  • 2025The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform55 cited
  • 2020Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability41 cited
  • 2021The Science of Open (Communication) Science: Toward an Evidence-Driven Understanding of Quality Criteria in Communication Research30 cited
  • 2023Questionable Metascience Practices28 cited
  • 2021Disconnected psychology and neuroscience—implications for scientific progress, replicability and the role of publishing17 cited
  • 2023Modelling Scientific Communities17 cited
  • 2025How can we make sound replication decisions?11 cited
  • 2022The advice less taken: The consequences of receiving unexpected advice10 cited
  • 2022The Problem of Irreproducible Bioscience Research9 cited
  • 2022Theoretical false positive psychology8 cited
  • 2021Estimating the reproducibility of psychotherapy effects in mood and anxiety disorders: the possible utility of multicenter trials7 cited
  • 2023Is Social Work Research in Crisis?5 cited
  • 2023Methodological Pluralism and the Pursuit of the Public Good1 cited