this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
- 1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
- 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
- 1904The Psychological Bulletin4,187 cited
- 2013The New Statistics3,182 cited
- 2019Scientists rise up against statistical significance2,997 cited
- 1978Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.1,949 cited
- 2019New Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in the Journal337 cited
- 2019The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else Is Known167 cited
- 2019What Have We (Not) Learnt from Millions of Scientific Papers with P Values?159 cited
- 2006Impact of Criticism of Null‐Hypothesis Significance Testing on Statistical Reporting Practices in Conservation Biology149 cited
- 2019How Effect Size (Practical Significance) Misleads Clinical Practice: The Case for Switching to Practical Benefit to Assess Applied Research Findings75 cited
- 2019Assessing the Statistical Analyses Used in Basic and Applied Social Psychology After Their p -Value Ban71 cited
Cited by
No citing works inside the corpus for this window.
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work