SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Demonstrating reliability through transparency: A scientific validity framework to assist scientists and lawyers in criminal proceedings
6 references·2 citing·31 second hop
Demonstrating reliability through transparency: A scientific validity framework to assist scientists and lawyers in criminal proceedings (2019)Demonstrating reliability through transpa…Linking Trust to Trustworthiness (2018)Linking Trust to Trustworthin…Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US—A commentary on the PCAST report (2017)Finding the way forward for f…Misleading DNA Evidence: Reasons for Miscarriages of Justice (2012)Misleading DNA Evidence: Reas…Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Scienc…Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Strengthening forensic scienc…Miscarriages of justice : a review of justice in error (1999)Miscarriages of justice : a r…A transparent approach: Openness in forensic science reporting (2024)A transparent approach: Openn…The transparency and reproducibility of systematic reviews in forensic science (2022)The transparency and reproduc…Investigation of secondary DNA transfer of skin cells under controlled test conditions (2010)Forensic Genetics in the Governance of Crime (2020)Is forensic science in crisis? (2022)Supporting Jury Understanding of Expert Evidence in a Virtual Environment (2022)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions (2004)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2004)Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability (2019)Is the (traditional) Galilean science paradigm well suited to forensic science? (2019)The strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism (2022)Modern Moral Philosophy (1958)#Republic (2017)MODERN MORAL PHILOSOPHY (2017)A bibliometric analysis of trust in the field of hospitality and tourism (2021)Citizen Knowledge (2023)Social media trust: Fighting misinformation in the time of crisis (2024)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Rethinking scientific communication in courts: A question of credibility (2024)Recommendations for producing knowledge syntheses to inform climate change assessments (2025)The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear. (2009)The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: Verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect. (2013)On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect (2014)Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions (2011)Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them? (2013)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)Rotten Orchards: "Pestilence", Police Misconduct and System Failure* (2003)Practitioners' beliefs about deception (2004)Interrogating to detect deception and truth : effects of strategic use of evidence (2005)The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
  • 2009Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward957 cited
  • 2018Linking Trust to Trustworthiness234 cited
  • 1999Miscarriages of justice : a review of justice in error75 cited
  • 2012Misleading DNA Evidence: Reasons for Miscarriages of Justice56 cited
  • 2017Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US—A commentary on the PCAST report35 cited

Cited by

  • 2022The transparency and reproducibility of systematic reviews in forensic science18 cited
  • 2024A transparent approach: Openness in forensic science reporting13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work