SStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleInter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews

Nadja Könsgen2019

Article2019

Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews

Nadja Könsgen · Ognjen Barčot · Simone Heß · Livia Puljak · Käthe Gooßen · Tanja Rombey +1 more

36 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials 2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies 2014Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters 2016A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials 1980Integration and generalization of kappas for multiple raters.2002Assessing intrarater, interrater and test–retest reliability of continuous measurements 2016Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews

Cited by

2024Artificial intelligence in food and nutrition evidence: The challenges and opportunities 2024Future of Evidence Synthesis: Automated, Living, and Interactive Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2023Inter-Rater Agreement in Assessing Risk of Bias in Melanoma Prediction Studies Using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST): Results from a Controlled Experiment on the Effect of Specific Rater Training 2021A new method for testing reproducibility in systematic reviews was developed, but needs more testing

Details

Year2019

Typearticle

Published2019-12-19

VenueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology

ISSN-L0895-4356

Languageen

Citations36

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.016

openalex_workW2994918429

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.