Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Imperfect but important: a fellow’s perspective on journal peer review

7 references·2 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review154 cited
2005A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript128 cited
2017Making the First Cut: An Analysis of Academic Medicine Editors’ Reasons for Not Sending Manuscripts Out for External Peer Review54 cited
2012Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals48 cited
2011Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review)20 cited
2010How to Peer Review14 cited
2015Just Because It's Published Doesn't Mean It's Perfect9 cited

Cited by

2023Scientists’ perception of pilot study quality was influenced by statistical significance and study design6 cited
2023Strategies for Developing Journal Peer Reviewers: A Scoping Review5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work