Brief Web-Based Intervention for Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial on Behavioral Activation

Lena Jelinek, Sönke Arlt, Steffen Moritz, Johanna Schröder, Stefan Westermann, Barbara Cludius

2019-12-16articleJournal of Medical Internet Research25 citationsgold

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Digital Mental Health Interventions Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes Mental Health Research Topics

Abstract

BACKGROUND Web-based interventions have been shown to be effective for the treatment of depression. However, interventions are often complex and include a variety of elements, making it difficult to identify the most effective component(s). OBJECTIVE The aim of this pilot study was to shed light on mechanisms in the online treatment of depression by comparing a single-module, fully automated intervention for depression (internet-based behavioral activation [iBA]) to a nonoverlapping active control intervention and a nonactive control group. METHODS We assessed 104 people with at least mild depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, >4) via the internet at baseline (t0) and 2 weeks (t1) and 4 weeks (t2) later. After the t0 assessment, participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) iBA (n=37), (2) active control using a brief internet-based mindfulness intervention (iMBI, n=32), or (3) care as usual (CAU, n=35). The primary outcome was improvement in depressive symptoms, as measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Secondary parameters included changes in activity, dysfunctional attitudes, and quality of life RESULTS While groups did not differ regarding the change in depression from t0 to t1 (ηp2=.007, P=.746) or t0 to t2 (ηp2=.008, P=.735), iBA was associated with a larger decrease in dysfunctional attitudes from t0 to t2 in comparison to CAU (ηp2=.053, P=.04) and a larger increase in activity from t0 to t1 than the pooled control groups (ηp2=.060, P=.02). A change in depression from t0 to t2 was mediated by a change in activity from t0 to t1. At t1, 22% (6/27) of the participants in the iBA group and 12% (3/25) of the participants in the iMBI group indicated that they did not use the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Although we did not find support for the short-term efficacy of the single-module iBA regarding depression, long-term effects are still conceivable, potentially initiated by changes in secondary outcomes. Future studies should use a longer intervention and follow-up interval. CLINICALTRIAL DKRS (#DRKS00011562)

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

References

2001The PHQ-9

1991Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.

1979Cognitive Therapy of Depression

2004The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group

2007Mediators and Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy Research

2016Why is depression more common among women than among men?

2003Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

Cited by

2021New Evidence in the Booming Field of Online Mindfulness: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2019Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for the treatment of current depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis

2022Mediators of acceptance and mindfulness-based therapies for anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2023Effects of digital psychotherapy for depression and anxiety: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis

2023Race, Ethnicity, and Other Cultural Background Factors in Trials of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: Systematic Review