Attachment and the archive: barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science
Abstract
This article explores historical sociology as a complementary source of knowledge for scientific research, considering barriers and facilitators to this work through reflections on one project. This project began as a study of the emergence and reception of the infant disorganized attachment classification, introduced in the 1980s by Ainsworth's student Mary Main, working with Judith Solomon. Elsewhere I have reported on the findings of collaborative work with attachment researchers, without giving full details of how this came about. Here, I will offer personal reflections arising from the process, and my work in what Hasok Chang has called history as "complementary science."
Cite this
Robbie Duschinsky (2019). Attachment and the archive: barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science. Science in Context. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889719000243
@article{robbie2019attachment,
title = {Attachment and the archive: barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science},
author = {Duschinsky, Robbie},
year = {2019},
journal = {Science in Context},
doi = {10.1017/s0269889719000243}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.