Usable, in‐use, and useful research: A 3U framework for demonstrating practice impact

Shan Ling Pan · Loo Geok Pee

53 citations0/0 files storedInformation Systems Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Research, Science, and Academia Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Abstract

Abstract In addition to innate curiosity, many of us also see scientific research as a way of making the world a better place. There has been a drive to better understand and observe the practical and societal impact of research, led by researchers seeking to find meaning and purpose in their work, as well as government agencies responsible for allocating research funding to maximum effect. Despite a wealth of guidance from researchers discussing impact and agencies evaluating impact, making practice impact visible and demonstrable remains arduous to researchers because it appears to be possible only at the end of a long and winding pathway to impact. This article presents a framework for demonstrating practice impact as it is being realized progressively, rather than only at the end of the pathway. It identifies usable, in‐use, and useful research outputs, with each having cumulative and demonstrable practice impact. Our analyses of existing impact evaluation guidelines and top‐ranked impact cases submitted to the Research Excellence Framework 2014 showed that all three forms of impact can be demonstrated and are recognized as practice impact. Framing impact in terms of “use” inherently connects the perspectives of researchers and beneficiary users and positions users as co‐producers of impact rather than passive objects and recipients of research. The 3U framework is descriptive as well as prescriptive. It identifies impact indicators for each form of impact. It also indicates the necessary actions for strengthening impact. When applied iteratively, the 3U framework facilitates the identification and pursuit of new research questions that will further solidify a research endeavour's practice impact.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 53 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Competing paradigms in qualitative research.1999Grounded Theory in Practice 1999Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance1 2012What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey 2013Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review 2016Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review 2008Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks1 2005The Information Systems Identity Crisis: Focusing on High-Visibility and High-Impact Research1

Cited by

2022What is the societal impact of university research? A policy-oriented review to map approaches, identify monitoring methods and success factors 2021Platform-based customer agility: An integrated framework of information management structure, capability, and culture 2021Societal impact of research: a text mining study of impact types 2019Research contributions: The role of the iconoclast 2023Practicing Effective Stakeholder Engagement for Impactful Research

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.