Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Pursuing Consilience: Using Behavioral Public Administration to Connect Research on Bureaucratic Red Tape, Administrative Burden, and Regulation

16 references·16 citing·33 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2008Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness11,572 cited
2015Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy5,309 cited
1970Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes4,670 cited
1976Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes3,903 cited
1998Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge2,669 cited
2017Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy1,833 cited
2006Thinking and Deciding1,422 cited
1999Consilience: the Unity of Knowledge708 cited
1991Understanding and managing public organizations536 cited
n.d.Administrative burden policymaking by other means455 cited
2019Human Capital and Administrative Burden: The Role of Cognitive Resources in Citizen‐State Interactions452 cited
1993A Theory Of Government “Red Tape”387 cited
2018Behavioral Public Administration ad fontes: A Synthesis of Research on Bounded Rationality, Cognitive Biases, and Nudging in Public Organizations314 cited
2002Red Tape: A Review and Assessment of Concepts and Measures269 cited
2009Nudge Nudge, Think Think: Two Strategies for Changing Civic Behaviour226 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2008

Thinking and deciding, 4th ed.

206 cited

Cited by

2022Reckoning With Race and Gender in Public Administration and Public Policy: A Substantive Social Equity Turn44 cited
2021How salient administrative burden affects job seekers’ locus of control and responsibility attribution: Evidence from a survey experiment33 cited
2023‘Feeling out’ the rules: A psychological process theory of red tape21 cited
2023What factors underlie burden tolerance in South Korea? Policy implementation domain, administrative efficiency, and bureaucratic personality20 cited
2020Rationale and process transparency do not reduce perceived red tape: evidence from a survey experiment18 cited
2021Nudging and Muddling through16 cited
2021The Psychological Process View of Bureaucratic Red Tape15 cited
2023Elevating subjective individual experience in public policy and public administration: Reflections on red tape, administrative burden, and sludge14 cited
2024Reducing administrative burdens in an energy bill assistance program13 cited
2024Nudging increases take‐up of employment services: Evidence from a large field experiment11 cited
2023Model of Human Fallibility: Traveling Behavioral Assumptions in Public Governance9 cited
2025Understanding the nomological network of red tape: Synthesis and research agenda8 cited
2021Accountability and effort among street-level bureaucrats: Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment7 cited
2024Bureaucratic sludge: Bureaucratic tasks and procedures leading to experiences of strain7 cited
2019Exploring the Frontiers of Administrative Behavior7 cited
2024“Although Burdened, Do We Need to Do More?” Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in Poverty Alleviation Policy Implementation6 cited