SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
New Author Guidelines for Displaying Data and Reporting Data Analysis and Statistical Methods in Experimental Biology
14 references·2 citing·34 second hop
New Author Guidelines for Displaying Data and Reporting Data Analysis and Statistical Methods in Experimental Biology (2019)New Author Guidelines for Displaying Data…Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)Scientists rise up against st…Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019)Reproducibility and Replicabi…Redefine statistical significance (2017)Redefine statistical signific…Publication Bias: The Elephant in the Review (2016)Publication Bias: The Elephan…The fickle P value generates irreproducible results (2015)The fickle P value generates …The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…The Statistical Crisis in Science (2014)The Statistical Crisis in Sci…Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Policy: NIH plans to enhance …Beyond Power Calculations (2014)Beyond Power CalculationsFalse-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyBelieve it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Believe it or not: how much c…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …Why and how we should join the shift from significance testing to estimation (2022)Why and how we should join th…fiddle: a tool to combat publication bias by getting research out of the file drawer and into the scientific community (2020)fiddle: a tool to combat publ…Strong Inference (1964)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Scientific Utopia (2012)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? (2015)Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation (2019)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The New Statistics (2013)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)The contact hypothesis re-evaluated (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Reproducibility in Science (2014)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches (2019)Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals (2020)Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2019Scientists rise up against statistical significance2,997 cited
  • 2017Redefine statistical significance2,771 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
  • 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,389 cited
  • 2014Beyond Power Calculations1,341 cited
  • 2014Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility1,247 cited
  • 2014The Statistical Crisis in Science959 cited
  • 2019Reproducibility and Replicability in Science921 cited
  • 2015The fickle P value generates irreproducible results766 cited
  • 2016Publication Bias: The Elephant in the Review337 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Why and how we should join the shift from significance testing to estimation80 cited
  • 2020fiddle: a tool to combat publication bias by getting research out of the file drawer and into the scientific community

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

16 cited