SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Réseaux sociaux académiques et diffusion de la production scientifique des chercheurs en biologie/médecine
14 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Réseaux sociaux académiques et diffusion de la production scientifique des chercheurs en biologie/médecine (2017)Réseaux sociaux académiques et diffusion …Availability of digital object identifiers in publications archived by PubMed (2017)Availability of digital objec…Trends and topics in eye disease research in PubMed from 2010 to 2014 (2016)Trends and topics in eye dise…ResearchGate como fuente de evaluación científica: desvelando sus aplicaciones bibliométricas (2016)ResearchGate como fuente de e…Web 2.0 Applications in Medicine: Trends and Topics in the Literature (2015)Web 2.0 Applications in Medic…ResearchGate: An effective altmetric indicator for active researchers? (2015)ResearchGate: An effective al…Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields (2015)Open access and sources of fu…Does ‘get visible or vanish’ herald the end of ‘publish or perish’? (2015)Does ‘get visible or vanish’ …Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites (2015)Disciplinary differences in t…Digital Presence of Norwegian Scholars on Academic Network Sites—Where and Who Are They? (2015)Digital Presence of Norwegian…An analysis of factors contributing to PubMed's growth (2015)An analysis of factors contri…Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network (2014)Online collaboration: Scienti…Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed (2013)Green open access policies of…Chercheurs 2.0 ? (2009)Chercheurs 2.0 ?Recherche bibliographique en biologie et en médecine : du bon usage de Medline Pubmed (2004)Recherche bibliographique en …Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals (2009)Research output availability on academic social networks: implications for stakeholders in academic publishing (2017)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2018)How Common Is Belief in the Learning Styles Neuromyth, and Does It Matter? A Pragmatic Systematic Review (2020)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Networked Scholarship and Motivations for Social Media use in Scholarly Communication (2017)Social networking for scientists: an analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate (2017)From Social Networks to Publishing Platforms: A Review of the History and Scholarship of Academic Social Network Sites (2019)Impact Factor Distortions (2013)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)Publishing and flourishing: writing for desire in higher education (2020)Retracted articles in oncology in the last three decades: frequency, reasons, and themes (2022)Linguistic positivity in soft and hard disciplines: temporal dynamics, disciplinary variation, and the relationship with research impact (2023)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Drivers and Implications of Scientific Open Access Publishing (2016)Research Handbook of Expatriates (2017)Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice (2017)Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Impact of using classroom response systems on students' entrepreneurship learning experience (2017)Communication, collaboration and contagion: “Virtualisation” of anatomy during COVID ‐19 (2020)Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective (2014)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and Limitations (2017)Author-level metrics in the new academic profile platforms: The online behaviour of the Bibliometrics community (2018)Use of author identifier services (ORCID, ResearcherID) and academic social networks (Academia.edu, ResearchGate) by the researchers of the University of Caen Normandy (France): A case study (2020)R esearch G ate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship? (2014)Estudio métrico de ALFIN en Iberoamérica: de la bibliometría a las altmetrics (2017)The lost academic home: institutional affiliation links in Google Scholar Citations (2017)Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns (2015)Types of DOI errors of cited references in Web of Science with a cleaning method (2019)Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers (2020)Article-Level Metrics (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Global pattern of science funding in economics (2016)Social Media Coverage of Scientific Articles Immediately After Publication Predicts Subsequent Citations - #SoME_Impact Score: Observational Analysis (2019)Big Scholarly Data: A Survey (2017)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network654 cited
  • 2015ResearchGate: An effective altmetric indicator for active researchers?147 cited
  • 2015Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites135 cited
  • 2013Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed133 cited
  • 2015Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields89 cited
  • 2015Digital Presence of Norwegian Scholars on Academic Network Sites—Where and Who Are They?84 cited
  • 2017Availability of digital object identifiers in publications archived by PubMed43 cited
  • 2015An analysis of factors contributing to PubMed's growth39 cited
  • 2015Does ‘get visible or vanish’ herald the end of ‘publish or perish’?38 cited
  • 2016ResearchGate como fuente de evaluación científica: desvelando sus aplicaciones bibliométricas37 cited
  • 2016Trends and topics in eye disease research in PubMed from 2010 to 201436 cited
  • 2009Chercheurs 2.0 ?24 cited
  • 2015Web 2.0 Applications in Medicine: Trends and Topics in the Literature16 cited
  • 2004Recherche bibliographique en biologie et en médecine : du bon usage de Medline Pubmed2 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.