Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Early career researchers and their authorship and peer review beliefs and practices: An international study

13 references·11 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2012Bias in peer review997 cited
2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
2012Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers393 cited
2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?300 cited
2014Peer review: still king in the digital age243 cited
2017Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices189 cited
2013Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature136 cited
2016Rewarding reviewers – sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explained124 cited
2012Authorship: Who's on first?109 cited
2019So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change?94 cited
2015Ongoing ethical issues concerning authorship in biomedical journals: an integrative review80 cited
2017Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers77 cited
2016Attitudes of referees in a multidisciplinary journal: An empirical analysis60 cited

Cited by

2023The pandemic and changes in early career researchers’ career prospects, research and publishing practices54 cited
2020National comparisons of early career researchers' scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

29 cited

2020How is open access publishing going down with early career researchers? An international, multi-disciplinary study27 cited

2022Comparison of early career researchers and senior career researchers as peer reviewers: A questionnaire survey in China16 cited

2022“Flawed, but like democracy we don’t have a better system”: The Experts’ Insights on the Peer Review Process of Evaluating Security Papers15 cited

2020Descubrir, leer, publicar, compartir y monitorizar el progreso: comportamiento de los investigadores junior españoles14 cited

2024Fundamental problems in the peer‐review process and stakeholders' perceptions of potential suggestions for improvement14 cited

2020Mapping the Landscape of Peer Review in Computing Education Research13 cited

2022Investing in the Academic Writing: Training Future Reviewers and Sustaining Efficient and Quality Peer Review10 cited

2023Peer review: the attitudes and behaviours of Covid-19 pandemic-era early career researchers9 cited

2021The role of salient beliefs influence on Malaysian academics’ intention to publish in indexed journals5 cited