Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Case report: a rapid review approach used by the UK National Screening Committee to inform recommendations on general population screening for vasa praevia

9 references·3 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement65,829 cited
2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.48,853 cited
2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,856 cited
2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
2015Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews140 cited
2016Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines137 cited
2015EPC Methods: An Exploration of Methods and Context for the Production of Rapid Reviews62 cited
2016The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies38 cited

Cited by

2021“Hasta la vista, baby” – will machine learning terminate human literature reviews in entrepreneurship?93 cited
2025Artificial Intelligence as a New Research Ally? Performing AI-Assisted Systematic Literature Reviews in Health Economics10 cited
2021A Mixed‐Method Usability Study on User Experience with Systematic Review Software5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work