SStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Avoid Cohen’s ‘Small’, ‘Medium’, and ‘Large’ for Power Analysis · Study

ReviewAvoid Cohen’s ‘Small’, ‘Medium’, and ‘Large’ for Power Analysis

Joshua Correll2020

Review2020

Avoid Cohen’s ‘Small’, ‘Medium’, and ‘Large’ for Power Analysis

Joshua Correll · Christopher Mellinger · Gary H. McClelland · Charles M. Judd

166 citations·0/0 files stored·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 166 citations exist upstream.

References

2007G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences 1992A power primer.2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 1971Social categorization and intergroup behaviour 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 1984Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis 2019Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense 1971Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.

Cited by

2020A Primer for Conducting Experiments in Human–Robot Interaction 2023Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology 2023Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size 2021Effect‐Driven Sample Sizes in Second Language Instructed Vocabulary Acquisition Research 2024Simulation-Based Power Analyses for the Smallest Effect Size of Interest: A Confidence-Interval Approach for Minimum-Effect and Equivalence Testing 2021Cohen's d and Physicians’ Opinion on Effect Size: A Questionnaire on Anemia Treatment 2023On the Reproducibility of Power Analyses in Motor Behavior Research 2023Sample size in quantitative instrument-based studies published in Scopus up to 2022: An artificial intelligence aided systematic review

Details

Year2020

Typereview

Published2020-01-15

VenueTrends in Cognitive Sciences

ISSN-L1364-6613

Languageen

Citations166

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.009

openalex_workW2998892261

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.