A Narrative Review of Methods for Applying User Experience in the Design and Assessment of Mental Health Smartphone Interventions

Christopher A. Lemon · Kit Huckvale · Kenneth Carswell · John Blake Torous

52 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Digital Mental Health Interventions Usability and User Interface Design Mobile Health and mHealth Applications

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: User experience (UX) plays a key role in uptake and usage of mental health smartphone interventions, yet remains underinvestigated. This review aimed to characterize and compare UX evaluation approaches that have been applied in this specific context, and to identify implications for research and practice. METHODS: A narrative review was conducted of UX-themed studies published in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus up to February 2019. Eligible studies reported on data reflecting users' interactions with a smartphone intervention for any mental health condition. Studies were categorized into "situated" versus "construct-based" methods according to whether or not an established UX construct was used to acquire and analyze data. RESULTS: Situated approaches used bespoke UX metrics, including quantitative measures of usage and performance, as well as grounded interview data. Construct-based approaches such as assessments of usability and acceptability were based on conceptual frameworks, with methodologically stronger versions featuring construct definitions, validated measurement tools, and an ability to compare data across studies. Constructs and measures were sometimes combined to form bespoke construct-based approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Both situated and construct-based UX data may provide benefits during design and implementation of a mental health smartphone intervention by helping to clarify the needs of users and the impact of new features. Notable however was the omission of UX methods, such as split testing. Future research should consider these unaddressed methods, aim to improve the rigor of UX assessment, integrate their use alongside clinical outcomes, and explore UX assessment of more complex, adaptive interventions.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 52 citations exist upstream.

References

2000A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies 2010Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review 2017Mental illness-related stigma in healthcare 2016Mental Health Smartphone Apps: Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Future Developments 2018Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements 2018Using Psychological Artificial Intelligence (Tess) to Relieve Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial 2014Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Smartphone Intervention for Schizophrenia 2017Interventions to reduce discrimination and stigma: the state of the art

Cited by

2022Adapting and Implementing Apps for Mental Healthcare 2022Analyzing the Impact of Mobile App Engagement on Mental Health Outcomes: Secondary Analysis of the Unwinding Anxiety Program 2023Empower Psychotherapy with mHealth Apps: The Design of “Safer”, an Emotion Regulation Application 2022A Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Study on the Performance of Age-Friendly Digital Retrofit Based on User Experience: Take the “Elder Mode” App as an Example

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.